How to achieve well-being and
happiness? Can these concepts be aims for individuals and nations as a whole? The
question is still relevant despite the fact that concept of happiness has been
debated for centuries.
Traditionally it was a job for philosophers to debate happiness. In the last decades academic disciplines such
as anthropology, economy, psychology and sociology have demonstrated growing
interest in happiness as an area of study. I will next explore
some of the historical and more recently published concepts and ideas of
happiness and well-being.
(a)
Greek philosophers
Plato, Aristotle and Seneca all talked about “eudaimonia” that consist
themes such as good-life-spirit, since then happiness has remained a core
topic in philosophy. More recent philosophers who have been influential figures
and interested in happiness are Immanuel Kant, who was interested mainly in the
temporary aspects of happiness and Soren
Kierkegaard who felt that personal choices and commitment are the key elements
of happiness.
(b) The
British Enligthment era philosopher, Jeremy Bentham’s main argument was that
the best society is the one where its citizens are happiest.
(c)
A new branch of psychology known as “Positive
Psychology” is interested in an individual’s subjective sense of well-being and
happiness. One of the best known academic in this field is Ed Diener who has
developed happiness measures to measure individual levels of happiness by
simply asking people how they feel about their life. Another well published
psychologist called Martin Seligman is seen as one of the pioneers who started
to conceptualise the very recent idea of positive psychology in 1990’s.
(d) The
British economist Richard Layard has been an influential figure in the debate
about the connection between happiness and economy, especially in the United
Kingdom (UK) For example, Layard has
been recently working as one of the advisors for UK’s Office for National
Statistics (ONS) in developing happiness measures for the United Kingdom.
(e)
Anthropologist Neil Thin has argued that happiness and
well-being are not seen as one single thing, but rather having multiple shapes
and meanings depending on the context of culture, place and society.
(f)
The concept of “Gross National Happiness” (GNH) is the
creation of King of Bhutan, Jigme Dorji, who introduced the concept in 1960s. This concept was more ideological and was
lacking detail and exact ideas of how to promote happiness and how to measure
it. Despite these short comings, the idea of GNH has influenced the debate of happiness
in the last decades.
(g)
Inspired by the concept of GNH, Sociologist Ruut
Veenhoven has developed many concepts of how to measure happiness in different
contexts. One well established measurement of individual happiness by Veenhoven
is known as the “Happy Life Years” measurement. This measurement combines an
objective indicator (life expectancy) and a subjective indicator (life
satisfaction) and calculates a Happy Life Years score from these dimensions.
(h) The
New Economic Foundation (NEF) designed a globally comparable measure called (un) Happy Planet Index (HPI) (2009) which combines “Happy Life Years” and the
amount of resources nations use in their pursuit of well-being and happiness.
The HPI is trying to draw our attention to happiness over period of time in a
wider environmental context of nations rather than individual ‘present’ experience
only.
(i)
The Stiglitz Commission (2009) report “Measurement of
Economic Performance and Social Progress” has placed happiness and well-being at
the core of many governmental polices across the industrialised countries since
being published.
Now we know a little bit of the history of happiness and well-being.
Next it will be helpful to know if it is well-being or happiness we want or a
bit of both?
No comments:
Post a Comment