Quality of Life (QoL) is often used
as a synonym for well-being. To keep clarity will continue to use the term ‘well-being’,
instead of ‘quality of life’. However, its notable that QoL is often linked to
the personal capabilities of individual. Interpersonal qualities of a person
such as self-esteem and sense of autonomy also play a role in an individual’s
sense of well-being.
Relationship play an essential role
for human happiness and can have direct impact upon people’s self-esteem. One
might say that by investing in quality of relationships will improve interpersonal
qualities of person and therefore support human development in the sense of
achieving greater level of QoL or well-being?
Numerous studies point out that
investing in human well-being has a long term positive impact not only at an individual
level, but for communities and nations as a whole. For example, Ben-Arieh et al.
(2001) argue this point by evidencing the fact that understanding children’s
health and nutrition alongside their spiritual, social and moral development
not only provides insight into children’s wellbeing now, but also their
’wellbecoming‘ in the future. From the children right’s perceptive children can
be seen as citizens in their own right who have declared rights as pointed out in United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (UNCRC) (1989). Acknowledging and establishing the fact that children have rights to
well-being now and wellbecoming in the future, provides justification for policies
which are purely designed for children and young people in mind.
High profile media cases of child
abuse have also led for a call for governments to design policies that will not
only keep children safe, but promote their well-being. Or one could argue that
these cases are simply making politicians and policy makers paranoid about
child protection at the expense of wellbeing. However, a number of policies have been developed to
meet this need such as the Getting It Right For Every Child (GIRFEC) (2008), a policy programme in Scotland which is broadly
similar to the English policy programme
‘Every Child Matters’. Both of these programmes are designed for professionals
in the children’s services workforce to improve children’s well-being. The UNICEF (2007) report ’An Overview of
Child Well-being in Rich Countries ranked children’s well-being in UK very poor
in comparison with 21 other industrialised countries. This finding itself
demanded reforms and new policies which aim to improve children’s well-being in
the UK. Data such as the UNICEF
publication provides evidence that can be used when arguing on behalf of new
policies. It gives a weight for the demands to place well-being at the core of
public policy design that is aimed for children and young people. If feelings of
happiness are subjective, making happiness an aim of policy might be a difficult
task. A recent NEF (2010) publication
concludes that: “Wellbeing is more than happiness. The aim of local government,
therefore, should not be to set out to make people happy, but to create the
conditions that enable citizens and communities to do well in life, to
flourish.” Investing in functioning communities that support social interaction and relationships
might be a sensible way forward to support individuals and communities to do
well in life.
Sources:
Ben-Arieh, A. and Goerge, R. (2007). Multinational Project
for Measuring and
Children’s Wellbeing (http://multinational-indicators.chapinhall.org/).
Getting it Right for Every Child (GIRFEC) programme (2008).
Scottish Government. Edinburgh: Scotland.(http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/People/Young-People/childrensservices/girfec/programme-overview).
NEF (2010).’ The role of local government in promoting
wellbeing.’ Local Government Improvement and Development and NEF. London,
England: The New Economics Foundation.
UNICEF
(2007).’An Overview of Child Well-being in Rich Countries.’ Florence: UNICEF (http://unicef-icdc.org/publications/pdf/rc7_eng.pdf).
UNCRC United Nations (1989). Convention on the Rights of the
Child. New York/Geneva: Centre for Human Rights, UN.
No comments:
Post a Comment